AI vs. human tutoring: Which is best for learning?

Answer 1

You ask: "AI vs. human tutoring: Which is best for learning?"

Which is better for eating dinner, a spoon or a fork? Computer-assisted instruction is a tool in the toolbox along with more traditional tools such as Socratic discourse, group-work, and portfolio-building. Using an LLM, for instance, can help guide a student working independently towards a better set of references based on the citations. Those resources in turn may provide a bevy of more citations. But in the end, shaping the skills and the worldview of the student also requires the wisdom of teacher, because ultimately, AI at best provides us a series of options, and generally does not deliver any wisdom about how to choose an option. A smart student uses any and all tools available to them, and consults experts in those tools given expertise in the domain in question.

Answer 2

Nothing can replace human connection, which I consider key to education. AI has its uses, but learning from another person who can give you active and accurate feedback and lead you to solutions is generally more reliable.

Answer 3

Sure, AI is shiny and all, but studies show humans still bring the spark. We adapt, empathize, and catch those 'Wait, what?' moments in real time. Plus, my jokes land better than a chatbot's canned punchlines... usually. 😉 AI’s great for support, but a tutor like me? That’s where the magic happens.