Paige T.

asked • 04/14/20

What did Sherriff Robinson, Larry Hendricks, and Clarence Ewalt discover in the Clutters’master bedroom, and what was significant about these discoveries?

In Cold Blood by Truman Capote



I've read the book but I just don't understand the significant part. If anyone could help I would be very grateful.

Mark G.

Clarence Ewalt, Larry Hendricks, and Sheriff Robinson found two things in the master bedroom, either (or both) of which are very significant. First, they found Herb Clutter's billfold. It was lying open, and a number of items were scattered about - but no cash. Apparently, someone had gone through the billfold, taking what cash they'd found. The killers themselves later said they had taken "between forty and fifty dollars" from the Clutter home. Most, if not all, of this cash was taken from Herb's billfold. It was fairly well-known in the community that Herb Clutter preferred to do business by check, and that he seldom, if ever, carried large amounts of cash. Even just finding the billfold with no cash was an important clue; it meant that robbery was probably a motive. Keep in mind, some in the community were convinced that the murders were committed by someone who hated the Clutters, and robbery wasn't the motive. Had that been the case, the killer(s) probably wouldn't have cared much about a few measly dollars in Herb's billfold. To me, the other item they found is extremely significant - and it's probably the item to which you are referring: Herb Clutter's glasses, which were lying atop the bureau. Herb had very poor eyesight, and if he'd left the bedroom voluntarily, it stands to reason he would have put his glasses on. The fact that he didn't suggests that he was forced from the room, quite possibly at gunpoint. So, perhaps, being flustered or alarmed, he merely forgot to put them on. However, given the totality of the situation Herb found himself in - two strangers in the house, in his bedroom, late at night, one armed with a rifle - it seems much more likely that Herb deliberately chose not to put on his glasses. Consider what might have happened, had he done so, and then looked directly at Hickock and Smith. There's a good chance they would have shot him to death, right on the spot. It's very possible he even reasoned this out in those fateful few minutes - he's a somewhat older man, in his pajamas, without his glasses, frightened, confused, stumbling along - might evoke pity from these two young fellows, who, for all he knew, might simply be a pair of ordinary thieves. Maybe they'll just take the $40 and leave, and not hurt him, or his family. Without his glasses, he wouldn't be able to identify them later, because - after all - he can't see well enough to even describe them.
Report

02/20/22

1 Expert Answer

By:

Erik H. answered • 04/15/20

Tutor
5 (7)

Creative Specialist with Master of Arts in Education

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.