Ethan B.

asked • 10/24/22

Do these two sentence have the same meaning?

The sunbeams are piercing the forest's canopy.


The forest's canopy is pierced with sunbeams.


2 Answers By Expert Tutors

By:

Rachel K. answered • 10/24/22

Tutor
0 (0)

Certified English Teacher in Texas with 18 years of Teaching Experienc

Ethan B.

I'm writing a poem, so i'm trying to find a way to say the same thing in a different ways in order to fit the rhyme scheme i have. So, the passive voice sentence doesn't have to be phrased as "the canopy is being pierced by sunbeams" in order to have the same meaning as the active voice? Or am i using "pierced" as an adjective?
Report

10/24/22

Rachel K.

"Pierced" is not functioning as an adjective in either sentence, and no you don't necessarily have to rephrase it to make it mean the same thing. For clarity, I would say the canopy is being pierced BY sunbeams. If the canopy were being pierced with a tool, like a kinfe, then WITH would work, but I don't think sunbeams count as a tool in this sentence. All that said, if you're writing poetry, you get a lot more leeway in what is considered "correct." Poetic license allows you to play with the rules a bit in order to achieve the desired effect of the line(s) of poetry.
Report

10/25/22

Ethan B.

Sorry, I just have one more question for clarity. Theses two sentences basically mean the same thing? "The canopy is pierced by sunbeams." The canopy is being pierced by sunbeams."
Report

10/25/22

Rachel K.

"Being pierced" implies that it is currently happening as you speak. "Is pierced" implies that it is a characteristic of sunbeams or of that particular canopy. Without the rest of your context, it's difficult to tell what the minor difference in meaning would be.
Report

10/25/22

Ethan B.

So "The canopy is pierced by sunbeams" is present continuous tense in the same way that "the sunbeams are piercing the canopy" is?
Report

10/24/22

Peter F.

tutor
I believe the sentence needs to be "The canopy is being pierced by sunbeams" in order to be classified as present continuous.
Report

10/24/22

Ethan B.

If im using "pierced" as an adjective, wouldn't that mean that the canopy's current state is that of being pierced by sunbeams, which is kind of the same, but in a different way, as present continuous tense?
Report

10/24/22

Peter F.

tutor
Here's where it gets a bit tricky, I guess. Suppose the canopy was pierced by javelins. To say "The canopy is pierced by javelins" would clearly not be in the present continuous tense, as it does not clarify whether the canopy is currently being pierced -- the javelins might have gone though it an hour ago, and one could still say "The canopy is pierced by javelins." The holes are still in the canopy, after all. But sunbeams, of course, travel at the speed of light, and leave no evidence of piercing anything after they're gone. So if it was said that "The canopy is pierced by sunbeams," it could be inferred that sunbeams are piercing the canopy at that very moment, or else the speaker would have to have said "The canopy was pierced by sunbeams" in order to make sense. So I suppose this is an example of when logic and the terminology of grammar are at odds with each other.
Report

10/25/22

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.