
David C. answered 04/24/22
UChicago Grad Tutoring Research Methods, Statistics, and Algebra
Hi Aevenir,
In addition to the prior two comments (and of particular relevance to comparative politics), we can examine the strength of the executive in Mexico in relation to its counterpart in the United States. As Geofrey noted above, Mexico elects its president for a single six-year term, meaning that their presidents are always lame-ducks because they will not be able to run again when their first term ends. This is of course in contrast to the U.S., where presidents can serve up to two terms. Aside from this important limitation on executive power, Mexican presidents have historically held a great deal of unilateral control over decision-making compared to the legislative branch and the courts. For instance, Mexican presidents issue executive decrees, introduce legislation directly to Congress (frequently), and can veto legislation they find disagreeable.
Beyond strict institutional comparison, the actual functions of the Mexican and American governments differ notably. For instance, up until the election of 2000, the national government was controlled by a single party (the PRI) which prevented the checks and balances of a presidential system from working as they do in the U.S. when the opposition party controls the legislature. It should be noted that this has started to change since 2000, however, when the PRI lost control of the presidency.
I hope that this has been informative.