
Greg B. answered 04/16/20
Teacher, AP World History
This depends on which answer you want to choose but most historians would argue that Patton's desire to go to war with the Soviet Union at the end of World War 2 would have been a huge mistake. The Red Army had millions of soldiers in Eastern Europe. They were battle tested in the kind of warfare that would require so many soldiers. The Allies had succeeded against the Germans but did so with air superiority and against far fewer German troops than the Soviets faced. The Soviets had gained air superiority over the German Luftwaffe. There were few targets to hit on the Russian side as most cities had been flattened. The forms of government would also have played an important role. No western democracy would have put up with the mass casualties the Soviet Union endured against the Nazis when they threw their men into well defended German lines with little regard for human life. It's far more likely to image the Soviet Union tolerating high casualties in such a conflict with the American public desiring a peace treaty after years of fighting in World War 2.
Tom M.
I agree in principle with this thorough analysis. However, I would refute the idea that Patton wanted to precipitate an all out war with Russia at the end of the war. It was an unusual situation. Russia would soon transition from a nominal ally near the end of the war to a rival. Stalin, the leader of Russia, was an irrational dangerous tyrant. It had been suggested that he caused more death in total than did Hitler. I believe Patton correctly foresaw that the Soviets would move in and occupy most of eastern Europe: Poland, East Germany, Hungary, etc... He was right. After the failed appeasement lesson from 1939, when the British learned that Hitler could not be stopped, I think Patton believed the only way to conduct any type of diplomacy with Stalin was to demonstrate this through the show of force. Cynically, it has been suggested that President Truman dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagaski at the end of WW II not only to end the war with the Japanese, but also to not so subtly frighten the Russians who had not yet developed the bomb. Did Patton really want to start WW III? Probably not. Was Patton tough and crude at times? Yes. Did he think Stalin would listen to reason and engage in rational diplomacy? I would guess Patton thought no to that one. I think Patton realized that Stalin responded to force and that Patton was posturing. Was Patton right? He died in a jeep accident right at the end of the war and we will never be able to ask him directly. Patton once did joke, "Do you know how smart I have to be in order to pretend to be so stupid?"04/17/20