Lines 27–32: Describe the way the author varies the syntax in this passage. Why does the author choose this style? What information is conveyed to the reader?

Answer 1

Samantha's answer is very precise and useful. I also lament not knowing which poem is being analyzed, but even without knowing the source, the advice is on point. I'd add only this:

Jones griped endlessly about the work, all the work, the constant problems, the redundant details piling up, the dizzying string of unstoppable theorums, the cascade of paradoxes, all avalanching in one stinking heap.

The writer of that sentence had a reason for making it so long, and for using the parallel structure, and for beginning it with the 'subject and verb' followed by all that detail, so that by the time you finish reading, you've forgotten the subject and verb, and remember only the rhythmic crescendo of tasks-to-do. That's using syntax for a RHETORICAL purpose--to move or emotionally affect the reader.

Answer 2

Without having the actual lines in reference, the easiest way to help is to offer some suggestions on syntax. Do these lines have a formal language style or an informal? Is there any repetition? Is there a parallel structure (sentences are formatted the same, i.e. "I know why I am this way. I know why I speak this way," etc.)? Syntax is merely grammar, but the purposeful use of grammar and sentence structure, so focus on what is happening in these lines based on the questions above and that should put you in the right direction.