1. Self-Gratification in 1967
During the Vietnam War, the U.S. government often acted on the belief that its goals—spreading democracy, containing communism—were inherently righteous. This led to:
- Overconfidence in military intervention: The U.S. assumed that superior firepower and strategy could “fix” Vietnam’s political problems.
- Ignoring dissenting voices: Reports from journalists, academics, and even military advisers were often downplayed or dismissed.
- Moral justification: Actions were framed as defending freedom, even when local consequences were disastrous.
Essentially, decisions were self-reinforcing, valuing American ideals and pride over complex realities on the ground.
2. Echoes in the Current Administration
While contexts differ, some argue that modern administrations exhibit similar traits:
- Policy overreach or unilateral action: Just as Vietnam involved interventions with limited local understanding, current foreign or domestic policies sometimes prioritize image, ideology, or prestige over nuanced outcomes.
- Confirmation bias and selective information: Leaders may highlight evidence that supports their narrative, dismissing contradictory data—mirroring the “ignore the inconvenient facts” approach of 1967.
- National exceptionalism: Framing policies as morally or historically inevitable can resemble the self-gratifying justification for U.S. actions in Vietnam.
- Public optics and messaging: Emphasis on what looks strong to the public or international observers, even if underlying effectiveness is uncertain.
3. Key Differences
It’s important to note that the current administration operates in a far different geopolitical and domestic environment:
- Information flows faster, with instant scrutiny from media and public.
- Military interventions are less frequent and more targeted.
- Domestic political polarization changes how self-gratification manifests—often through policy branding rather than large-scale war escalation.
4. Synthesis
The throughline is prioritizing national pride, ideology, or image over complex realities, whether in 1967 Vietnam or today. Both eras show how a government can become self-validating, acting in ways that feel “right” to itself while underestimating consequences.