Max M. answered • 08/23/19
Improve your skills and scores with a Harvard grad.
No, you identify three things mentioned in the article that are part of the basis on which the writer draws conclusions. So events that happened, scientific evidence, physical characteristics, things that are not subject to opinion. So if it's a story about, say, pet adoption. The article might mention that adoption is better than buying because it's important to relieve the burden on shelters that have more dogs and cats than they can take care of, such as the ABC Shelter in XYZ City, which has announced that it cannot take any more animals in 2019.
You may or may not find that argument convincing, but the only fact in what I just wrote was the shelter's announcement. The part about something being "better" or "important" is opinion.
