
Max M. answered 08/05/19
Harvard Literature major with 20 years of coaching writers
Well, obviously, as a writing tutor, I'm going to say the best solution is to work with a tutor, who can suggest edits so that you can start to hear what your own voice sounds like when it's more concise. Needless to say, I'd be happy to work with you.
From the world of quick tips, I offer these:
- You have a lot of subordinate clauses in your sentence. If you need to write all that to make sense of it, fine, but then go back over it and see if there are any that the readers can live without, or, if they can't, can you make any of them separate sentences? For instance, maybe you could have pulled out those two middle clauses and written a sentence like: "Such an increase would have allowed the temperature of the t---- and t----- to reach equilibrium before increasing the temperature again." (I don't think equilibrate is a word)
- Double negatives aren't always wrong (like in this sentence), but they do make things more complicated, so if you can rephrase to avoid them, do it.
- The "have" in your first clause should be deleted ("had there not have been" should be "had there not been")
And more generally, the more you read, the more you'll develop your own taste for elegant language. If you mainly write science papers, I'd recommend reading scientists you enjoy, not just for their ideas, but whose work you actually enjoy. You might try Richard Feynman and Rachel Carson for a start, if you're looking for ideas. I haven't read Stephen Hawking, but there's probably a reason "Brief History of Time" became a bestseller. And Bill Bryson isn't mainly a science writer, but you might enjoy "A Short History of Nearly Everything."
But again, best solution, work with a tutor / editor.