How to convince suspension cells to adhere more tightly?
2 Answers By Expert Tutors

Amy S. answered 07/24/19
Certified Math and Science teacher with MS
This is just a suggestion, as I have worked with tissue culture cells in the past, but never without FBS to allow the cells to adhere to the surface of the assay plate. Can you design an experiment that tests the concentration of FBS in varying amounts from 5% up to say 15%. If you are culturing them in FBS and using DMEM can you try doing your assay in DMEM if PBS is the issue? Also, I assume when you are changing the media that you are replacing the new media by not directly pipetting onto the surface of the plate, but rather the side.
This sounds like a trouble shooting issue unfortunately. However, I would start by designing a dose concentration FBS experiment. I am wondering if there is a small dose that you can use that allows the cells to adhere and not inhibit the uptake of the drug. Best of luck to you, I know how much it can be a struggle and such a time consuming endeavor tissue culture work is!
Try filter plates instead of encouraging attachment. You will change the gene expression if you adapt non-adherent cells to attachment.
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Tyler J.
You're definitely not alone in dealing with this kind of challenge getting suspension-adapted cells to behave like adherent ones under assay conditions can be frustrating. From your description, it sounds like you're already doing many of the right things, including using CELLBind surfaces and switching to DMEM + 10% FBS for pre-assay culture. Unfortunately, as you've noted, even with these measures, the lack of serum during the assay (due to drug uptake concerns) is likely contributing to detachment under shear stress. In addition to increasing FBS during the culturing phase (which might help improve integrin expression and promote stronger ECM interaction), you might want to experiment with ECM protein coatings like fibronectin or collagen, I’ve seen some labs get better adherence from suspension-adapted lines using fibronectin at lower concentrations, which may help limit autofluorescent background. Another workaround I’ve used in similar contexts is switching to a mild serum replacement (e.g., BSA or defined supplements like ITS) during the wash/assay steps. It won't replicate FBS completely but can reduce the cell stress from being in protein-free PBS. Also, if you're not totally locked into traditional well plates, have you considered using filter-bottom plates or specialized assay platforms that reduce the need for tight adherence during washes? There are some great layout and plate comparison resources at https://96wellplatetemplate.com/ for reference on formats that might better suit your workflow, especially if you’re dealing with cells that won’t stick well no matter what. Lastly, while poly-D-lysine might increase background, coating with lower-fluorescence options like Cell-Tak (from mussel adhesive proteins) could be worth testing in a pilot plate if you're concerned about signal interference. Hope this helps, and best of luck optimizing, these assays always take some creative problem solving to get just right.04/29/25