Asked • 06/24/19

How to convince suspension cells to adhere more tightly?

I'm developing a cell-based assay in 96-well plates that requires adherent cells, as they need to be washed at least twice during the protocol. I'm using in-house strains of [HT1080](https://www.atcc.org/Products/All/CCL-121.aspx) cells (some overexpressing a certain protein of interest) that unfortunately have been selected for suspension growth in chemically-defined media (50/50 [CD-CHO](http://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/product/10743011?ICID=search-product)/[CD-293](https://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/product/11913019?ICID=search-product)). I can convince them to adhere by culturing in [DMEM](http://www.invitrogen.com/site/us/en/home/Products-and-Services/Applications/Cell-Culture/Mammalian-Cell-Culture/Classical_Media/dmem.html) with 10% [FBS](http://products.invitrogen.com/ivgn/product/16000036?ICID=search-product) and growing them in [CELLBind](http://www.corning.com/lifesciences/us_canada/en/technical_resources/surfaces/culture/corning_cellbind_polystyrene.aspx) flasks, but they still tend to pull away if there is very much shearing force, such as during the wash steps, or when they're in PBS during the assay wash and incubation steps (maybe 2 hours total for now, I'm still optimizing that).Unfortunately, the parameters of my experiments don't allow me to keep the cells in serum-containing media during the assay, as it would interfere with the uptake of my drug. Like I've said, when in PBS they start detaching, and I would assume the same in HBSS, which I don't really want to use anyway due to its low buffering capacity in CO<sub>2</sub> incubators. Might DMEM alone (without FBS) provide a little more impetus to stay attached during the assay? What would the effect be of increasing the amount of FBS to say 15 or 20% during culturing - would that promote stronger attachment? I'm a little hesitant to coat the wells with poly-*D*-lysine, as my readout is on a fluorescent imager, and I'm worried it would substantially increase background. I don't really have enough time to re-select the cells for adherent growth (although if I'd known about these issues from my predecessor 3 or 4 months ago I would have started right away...), so are there any other tricks I can try in the meantime? Are there any media supplements I could use to promote adherin expression or something like that? Any tips or advice at all would be appreciated.

Tyler J.

You're definitely not alone in dealing with this kind of challenge getting suspension-adapted cells to behave like adherent ones under assay conditions can be frustrating. From your description, it sounds like you're already doing many of the right things, including using CELLBind surfaces and switching to DMEM + 10% FBS for pre-assay culture. Unfortunately, as you've noted, even with these measures, the lack of serum during the assay (due to drug uptake concerns) is likely contributing to detachment under shear stress. In addition to increasing FBS during the culturing phase (which might help improve integrin expression and promote stronger ECM interaction), you might want to experiment with ECM protein coatings like fibronectin or collagen, I’ve seen some labs get better adherence from suspension-adapted lines using fibronectin at lower concentrations, which may help limit autofluorescent background. Another workaround I’ve used in similar contexts is switching to a mild serum replacement (e.g., BSA or defined supplements like ITS) during the wash/assay steps. It won't replicate FBS completely but can reduce the cell stress from being in protein-free PBS. Also, if you're not totally locked into traditional well plates, have you considered using filter-bottom plates or specialized assay platforms that reduce the need for tight adherence during washes? There are some great layout and plate comparison resources at https://96wellplatetemplate.com/ for reference on formats that might better suit your workflow, especially if you’re dealing with cells that won’t stick well no matter what. Lastly, while poly-D-lysine might increase background, coating with lower-fluorescence options like Cell-Tak (from mussel adhesive proteins) could be worth testing in a pilot plate if you're concerned about signal interference. Hope this helps, and best of luck optimizing, these assays always take some creative problem solving to get just right.
Report

04/29/25

2 Answers By Expert Tutors

By:

Amy S. answered • 07/24/19

Tutor
5 (29)

Certified Math and Science teacher with MS

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.

OR

Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.