Lucinda L. answered 05/10/17
Tutor
5
(68)
RN 45 yrs, Experienced, Master's-prepared Professional Adult Educator
The first big clue is in your heading. "The ECG showed no p wave." We don't know what else the ECG looked like except that the rate was 130-150, which by definition is tachycardia (anything over 100). Given her age (34), heart rate, symptoms, and presuming she is otherwise healthy, this woman likely experienced supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). This is a way of saying the tachycardia originates above the ventricles, though we may not be sure exactly where. If she experienced ventricular tachycardia she would have lost consciousness and been in far worse shape.
This woman's symptoms are typical of SVT. The lightheadedness, chest pressure and shortness of breath are indicative of decreased cardiac output due to the fast heart rate, which may have been made worse by the fact that the rhythm apparently didn't originate in the SA node (no p waves). This would cause a reduction in cardiac output by 30% due to the loss of atrial kick. Her fast heart rate reduces ventricular filling time and blood flow to the coronary arteries, which in turn reduces oxygen supply to the cardiac muscle, causing chest pain.
There are several different types of supraventricular tachycardia, but I would venture a guess that this woman had what is called paroxysmal (sudden onset) supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) due to her young age, health status (apparently pretty good since she is working out at the gym), similar symptoms in the past, and sudden onset. The fact that the woman stayed overnight in the ER, rather than being admitted to the ICU, suggests a benign type of tachycardia such as PSVT. Also, the fact that she was treated with low-dose beta blockers is suggestive of PSVT.