Susannah C. answered 03/06/25
PhD in English Literature (medieval specialist), 20+ years exp.
Alys of Bath is what we might call a proto-feminist figure because she was created
before the advent of feminism. She exhibits some qualities that might fit a twenty-
first definition of feminism: she speaks out, even when those around her would
prefer her to be silent; she responds to the sexist claims of those around her (like
the Miller); she defends her out-spoken and defiant perspectives using her role as a
woman and as a wife (and widow). Being a widow gives her social authority,
although in the Middle Ages it would also have made her appear sexually
permissive. She finds herself in a position of both authority and power, at least in
terms of her speech and in her presence on the Canterbury pilgrimage, but, as a
woman, she is also aware that she will be misconstrued and that her words could
endanger her. Remember, too, that she lived in a time when outspoken women
could by severely punished by their communities and their Church, so she is
careful to base what she says in Biblical and scholarly works that give her added
legitimacy and authority.
One of the most feminist “takes” from her Prologue is her reliance on the goddess
Venus, goddess of sexuality and heterosexual (male) desire. Venus does not protect
women from rape or objectification (you can see that in Chaucer’s Legend of Good
Women and Knight’s Tale). She is not really a friend to women, but she is a goddess
and one who has great sexual power, from which Alys draws several times in her
Prologue to give her, again, authority and power.
The Wife herself has a lot of qualities that we might ascribe to feminism now, but
her tale is different. The premise of the entire story is the rape of an un-named,
silent woman. The knight in the tale has to prove he deserves to live by finding out
what women want, and the answer he gives, that they want sovereignty, is difficult
to unpack. Once he gets his answer he gets his life back, but he then has to give it
to a horrid ugly hag who gives him the choice of a beautiful cheating wife or an
ugly faithful one. He gives the choice to her—giving her sovereignty—and she
becomes both beautiful and faithful, but she then becomes, in many ways,
submissive to his authority as her husband: so how is that feminist?
Alys’ tale makes this question much more complicated: she herself can be seen as
feminist in a lot of ways, but her tale only really gives power to magical, unruly
(unreal) women and reaffirms the social order of marriage and female submission
in the end.
Further reading:
Delany, Shelia. “Sexual Economics, Chaucer's Wife of Bath and The Book of
Margery Kempe.” Minnesota Review New Series 5 (1975): 104-15.
Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics, Madison, WI: University of
Wisconsin Press, 1990.
Evans, Ruth and Leslie Johnson. Feminist Readings in Middle English Literature:
The Wife of Bath and All Her Sect. London: Routledge, 1995.
Ireland, Colin A. “‘A Coverchief or a Calle’: The Ultimate End of the Wife of
Bath’s Search for Sovereignty.” Neophilologus 75.1 (Jan. 1991):150-159.
Knapp, Peggy. Chaucer and the Social Contest. New York and London: Routledge.
1990.
Laskaya, Anne. Chaucer’s Approach to Gender in the Canterbury Tales.
Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1995.
Leicester, H. Marshall. “Of a Fire in the Dark: Private and Public Feminism in The
Wife of Bath’s Tale. Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales: A Casebook.
Edited by Lee Patterson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Turner, Marion. The Wife of Bath: A Biography. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, 2023.