Raymond B. answered 02/21/23
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
Giant takes 4 hours, bigger things take bigger time, so to speak, Gorillas maybe twice the size of Chimps
while 4 hrs/wk = twice 2 hr/wk
260 hrs is far from twice 230 hrs 260<<2(230)
so 1st guess is do all chimps, 16 c, 0 G
chimps beat Gorillas, (ignoring their usual likely encounters)
Chimp takes 2 hours to make
32 hours max for both combined, which means 16 max chimps, 8 max Giants, per week
or
4G+2c = 32
or
2G + c = 16
c= 16-2G
graph with c on x axis, G on y axis
a straight line boundary with x intercept = 16, y intercept=8
room only for 10 in their showroom each week
this is seemingly significant information, but seems far more irrelevant, without more information maybe on advertizing costs
$260 profit on each G, $230 on each chimp
do all Gorillas and P =8(260)= $2,080 Profit
do all on chimps and P=16(230) = $3,680 Profit
16x230 = $3,630 max profit, with all chimps, zero Gorillas
chimps beat Gorillas almost 2 to 1,
they name sports teams after animals, maybe it's time for the New York (SF lately) Giant Gorillas to lose to the Brooklyn (now LA) dodger chimps. Eagles just lost to the frogs in the Superbowl. It happens. eagles/frogs roughly = the gorilla/chimps ratio. Give or take a little DNA
graph the constraint, it's a line with slope =-1/2
graph the indifference curves, the max profit curve (line) intersects at (16,0) =(c,G)
production possibilities vertices are (0,0), (8,0), (16,0). It's a triangle
if the question makes sense, or if I understand it The Friday thing is confusiing
or irrelevant.
You could get a headache thinking about it.