
MICHAEL D. answered 11/21/19
PhD in Biology with 10+ years research, teaching, tutoring experience
Hello,
In principle shortwave UV is considered lethal to microorganisms and more importantly inactivates DNA due to the accumulations of thymine dimers. There are several caveats on to this working optimally not the least of which is whether you are dealing with photo-insensitive microorganisms, intensity of light source, distance of light source, augmentation with photosensitizers, etc. UV treatment is a tool as part of a process. A researcher/company might use several tools in combination to decontaminate a bench, room, etc. For example,
1) treatment with 70% ethanol
2) 30 minute UV exposure
or
1) treatment with 70% ethanol
2) treatment with 10% bleach
3) 30 minute UV exposure
or
1) treatment with 70% ethanol
2) treatment with 10% bleach
3) 30 minute UV exposure + photosensitizers
The UV light is not show. You can find examples of this being used effectively (see references in reference 1 below). It comes down to how the UV light is implemented. Because users may use the UV strategy in difference ways, you will get different outcomes. In a recent literature review, researchers cannot conclude the efficacy of UV light treatment for these exact reasons let alone make predictions about public health outcomes on a wholistic scale. It's not to say it doesn't work, it's just that we don't have a uniform protocol that everyone follows. Hope this helps. See suggested reading below.
References:
1) Health Quality Ontario (2018) Portable UV light surface-disinfecting devices for prevention of HAI: a health technology assessment
2) Reed (2010) The history of UV germicidal irradiation for air disinfection