Asked • 06/29/19

When do I explain my created world scenario in a prologue vs. letting it unfold in the story?

Let's say I'm creating a unique world for my book. New planet, maybe new species, complex society with complex rules, history, government, and so on. Some of these details are absolutely necessary to understand the plot of the story.There are two ways to give this information to the reader. 1. **Prologue of some kind:** Anne McCaffrey had this in the beginning of her original dragon trilogy, explaining how humans came to Pern, what dragons were in this context, what Thread was (both in scientific reality and what it meant to the Pernese), and how things had changed and developed to leave the society as it was when the story opened. David & Leigh Eddings did something similar for the Belgariad and Malloreon series, although theirs were more faux historical documents, with each book's prologue having a different tone and style and giving a different piece of history. 2. **Jump in and learn along the way:** Mercedes Lackey's Arrows of the Queen trilogy just starts, and we learn about the society and Companions as the same time as the 13-year-old narrator.My question is: Where is the tipping point between explaining the world as the narrator is introduced and the story gets underway, and setting the scene before the story starts so that you're not infodumping and having characters say ridiculously obvious things for the reader's benefit? At what point is a world so complex that you kind of have to explain some of it before getting underway? Is it always "lazy" to have this kind of prologue? (I'm not talking about a recap prologue, by the way — sometimes you need a refresher, and I'd honestly rather have that in the prologue than have characters waste time thinking about what happened in the previous book just to remind the reader.)

Jeremy L.

While it's difficult to judge without sufficient context, my basic philosophy is to "show, don't tell." Related to this point is that if you're having difficulty showing the details you'd like to convey, it may be worth considering whether these details serve a necessary function in furthering the broader purposes of the narrative. I would suggest that, when considering your audience, it is a good rule of thumb to assume that most readers will never read the prologue, and those that do will often do so only after finishing the book. So one question I might ask myself is, "What information, if anything, do I think the reader would still be interested to discover in the prologue once the narrative has finished speaking for itself?" With that said, you definitely want to avoid info-dumping at all costs, but I'm not sure you alleviate the problem by info-dumping in the prologue instead. When I find myself trying to figure out whether the intended audience is more likely to savor the detailed complexity rather than choking on it, I tend to believe that you can only answer the question if you can adequately account for how each detail performs an indispensable element in constructing a coherent whole. In other words, I try to worry less about my audience "getting it" because, to the extent that I can adequately justify how the details are instrumental to the internal consistency of ideas my story is intended to communicate, the complexity itself requires no further justification or explanation.


2 Answers By Expert Tutors


Breanna C. answered • 07/05/19

New to Wyzant

Italian/Spanish Teacher & Writer

Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.

Ask a question for free

Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.


Find an Online Tutor Now

Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.