Correspond to vs. Correspond with?

Question

Is there any significant difference between `Correspond to` and `Correspond with`? I only mean in the sense of "matching", here, rather than "communication". I've looked at a few sources, but I can't seem to find a good explanation that makes it clear in which context each form would be used. Some sources suggest that only `Correspond to` is used in the sense of "matching", whereas others suggest `Correspond with` can also be used in that sense (and sometimes also with slightly different meaning).

Answer 1

For the purpose of matching, either with or to is correct after the word correspond.

I found it in dictionary.com as well:

Correspond - to be in agreement or conformity (often followed by with or to)