The question essentially transforms into: why does DNA have a stronger ion pair attraction to the diethylaminoethyl group of the ion exchange resin?
This principle is not explained in the Qiagen literature, but must be deduced by chemistry reasoning. It's NOT a matter of size. It IS all about what that extra -OH group does in the RNA, that the -H group on the corresponding DNA does not do. And that is, affect the ionization behavior of the phosphate group attached adjacent. The phosphate has (formally) one doubly-bonded O, and one singly-bonded O (in addition to the two O's which link to adjacent bases, that's a common feature to both DNA and RNA). But remember, these are hybidized bonds -- not permanently =O and -O respectively. So when the DNA has a non-polar C-H on the base adjacent, that makes that nearest-by P-O bond more towards P=O and less towards P-O(-) . That is, two non-polar groups are happier adjacent than are one non-polar and one polar. Then, the P-O bond on the *other* side of the P, the one pointing towards the resin, has to"take up the slack" and become *more* like P-O(-) . Hence, it attracts the resin (+) charged group more strongly. Since this happens at many sites along the chain of the RNA or DNA, the increase in attractive interaction going from RNA to DNA is profound, and requires much higher salt concentration to get in and break the DNA away.
Jesse E.
Do you have any resources that explain this? And I disagree with your comment it not being a matter of size. The mass difference between RNA and DNA does contribute into this. The DNA, because of its size, will take more time to go through to the resin than either RNA or protein. However, I do think your explanation of the negative charges is great.06/27/19