There is probably some short simple brilliant solution to this one, but here's the approach I would take using a bit of trigonometry:
Note that the area of the large triangle = AB*AC*sin A = AB*BC*sin B = AC*BC*sin C.
Note that area of triangle Aqr = Ar*Aq*sin A = (n * AB / (m+n)) * (m*AC / (m+n)) * sin A = nm * AB * AC * sin A / (m+n)2
Computing the area of the triangles Brp and Cqp, the same way, note that each of these three has the same area. Therefore, the area of the small triangle is:
AB*AC*sin A - 3 * nm * AB * AC * sin A / (m+n)2
So Area ABC / Area pqr = AB * AC * sin A / (AB*AC*sin A - 3 * nm * AB * AC * sin A / (m+n)2)
Note that AB * AC * sin A cancels out, so we get:
1 / (1 - 3 * nm /(m+n)2) = (m+n)2 / [(m+n)2 - 3 * mn]
Note that in the special case where m = n, this gives us 4, as expected. In the special case where m = 0, this gives us 1, also as expected.
There's probably another tutor on here with a more elegant solution, but hopefully this helps you. If you have additional questions, feel free to let me know.
Stephen M.
tutor
Probably true, although the fact that all the trig cancels out makes me wonder if there's an elegant geometric derivation that doesn't require using trig.
Report
12/29/16
Zac S.
I know that this is an old thread but I thought I should add that there is a solution which does not require trig and it relies on the observation that the perpendicular height between R, B and CA are proportional by a factor of m/(n+m) due to the similarity between the triangles these make with AR and AB. you can then deduce that area AQR = mn/(m+n)^2 * area ABC. Your solution carries you the rest of the way
Report
07/01/21
Mark M.
12/29/16