The way that I would solve this problem is by graphing both the purse snatcher (thief) and the police officer, and the point where they intersect is where the officer catches up to the thief. The y-axis can represent how many meters were run, and the x-axis can represent how many seconds it has taken.

**Step 1. Figure out the slope for both the thief and the officer.**

**Thief:** Can run 20 meters in 4 seconds. If we write that as a slope, it would be 20 meters/4 seconds. We can simplify that down to 5 meters/second. Therefore our slope will be 5/1 or 5.

**Officer:** Can run 32 meters in 4 seconds. If we write that as a slope, it would be 32 meters/4 seconds. We can simplify that down to 8 meters/second. Therefore our slope will be 8/1 or 8.

**Step 2. Figure out the y-intercepts for both the thief and the officer. **

**Thief:** Started 9 meters ahead of the officer. So the y-intercept would be (0,9).

**Officer:** Started 9 meters behind the theif. So the y-intercept would be (0,0).

**Step 3. Write the equations for the line for the thief and the officer.**

**Thief:** y = 5x + 9

**Officer:** y= 8x + 0

**Step 4. Set the lines equal to each other and solve for x. **This is because the point at which they intersect will be the same point for both lines, so if you find **x** you can put that value in either equation to find the value for **y**.

`y = 5x + 9 `*and *y = 8x + 0

5x + 9 = 8x + 0

-9 -9

5x = 8x -9

-8x -8x

-3x = -9

/-3 /-3

x = -9/-3

x = 3

Then plug in the **x** value into either of the equations:

`y = 5x + 9 `*or * y = 8x + 0

y = 5(3)+9 *or * y = 8(3)+0

y = 15 + 9 *or ** *y = 24 + 0

y = 24 *or * y = 24

**Step 5. Analyze your results.**

The point that you end up with is x = 3, y = 24 *or* (3,24). Since the y-axis is how many meters were traveled, and the x-axis is how many seconds. That means that in 3 seconds, the officer would have caught up to the thief. As well, we can tell that the officer caught the thief 24 meters away from the starting point.

Michael B.

Nice answer. Your use of ms

^{-1}might be a bit unclear to the OP, so my suggestion would be to keep it simple... Just write 'm/s' instead.11/18/12