
David B. answered 09/09/24
Math and Statistics need not be scary
Assuming a shuffled deck of 3 Aces and 3 Kings for a total of 6 cards to start.
Given the optimum strategy of
- guess the card type that has the highest remaining count. If the counts are equal, guess either one. (keep track of cards drawn)
NOTE. draws are NOT independent as knowledge of prior draws changes the guess strategy.
First draw: prior knowledge = 3 of one card, 3 of second card. P success = .5 Random guess (Expected value of winnings for first draw is .5 * $1 or $.5)
Second draw: prior knowledge = 2 of one card , 3 of another [2:3]. Guess the other. P success = 3/5 or .6. Calculation of expected winnings follows as above = $.60
Third draw: We do not ignore the prior draws and use that knowledge to make next guess. Either we have 1 of one card and 3 of another. OR 2 of one card and 2 of another (odds are 2/5 of the first combination [ 1:3 ] and 3/5 of the second combination [ 2:2 ]. Since we know which of these combinations we have we will pick the best choice for each combination. Expected value = .4 * 3/4 + .6 *2/4 or 8/12 ($.60)
Fourth draw: Following above logic our expected number of wins = $.65
here we can simplify calculations by using reverse logic:
Sixth draw: We know what last 5 draws were so we know what the remaining card is.
Probability of success is 1 and expected value of win is $1
Fifth draw : Following reverse logic from 6th draw we know that we will have 2 cards, either an A,K or 2K or 2A with proportion of occurrence of .5, .25, .25. For either 2K or 2A we will know what the next draw must be. Only in the case of the A + K pair will the chance be .5 of success. Expected value for successes will be E(guess=True) = .5 * .5 + .25 *1 + .25*1 or .75 Expected win = $.75
Sum of all wins for 6 guesses and draws = $4.10

David B.
reverse logic does not need to be used but since it is obvious that the last card drawn must be known once 5 cards have been drawn the solution for the last draw is obvious (prob of correct guess =1, win = $1) Working backward from that is a way to avoid the method of possible outcomes used in the 'forward' method. Doing analysis is not always done from front to back, going from last to first is also an option. I left the 4th step for the student to get the student to think things thru. The 'forward' method is just conditional probability. First determine an optimum guess, then determine the probability of each of two outcomes. Next step then does the same but starts with 2 different possible starting cards (conditions). The third is even worse with 4 different starting sets. Here we can use simplifying assumptions and talk about 'one' card vs 'another' , meaning selected or not. This way the combinations of cards which are mirror images (2A and 3K vs 2K and 3A) can be treated as one combination for ease of calculation. If it is hard to imagine, one can still do the 'long' method of calculating for each possible starting setup of cards at each step. The use of simplifying assumptions in math is quite common. The results are correct, the methods are all rigorous, just different complexity. Check James S. He used a long method for all possible outcomes and calculated the expected winnings and came up with the same value.09/11/24
James S.
09/11/24
James S.
09/09/24