Let's complete the sentence using each answer and determine if the resulting sentence makes logical sense.
A) "Nader must be cold. He isn't wearing a jacket."
- The use of "must" implies a necessity or strong likelihood.
- However, the fact that he was not wearing a jacket does NOT necessitate that he was cold.
- Therefore, to assume he was cold does not logically follow from the fact that he was not wearing a jacket.
B) "Nader can't be cold. He isn't wearing a jacket."
- The use of "can't" implies an inability.
- However, similar to option A, the fact that he was not wearing a jacket does NOT require that he could not be cold.
- Therefore, to assume that he can't be cold does not logically follow from the fact that he was not wearing a jacket.
C) "Nader might be cold. He isn't wearing a jacket."
- The use of "might" implies the possibility of something being true but also that it might not be so.
- The fact that he was not wearing a jacket could raise the possibility that he is cold but also the possibility that he is not cold.
- Therefore, to state that he might be cold (while leaving open the possibility that he is not cold) can logically follow from the fact that he is not wearing a jacket.
D) "Nader must have [a] cold. He isn't wearing a jacket."
- The use of "must have" has similar problems as option A but also changes the meaning of the word cold to having a physical illness.
- However, the fact that he was not wearing a jacket does NOT necessitate that he had a physical illness.
- Therefore, to assume that he must have a cold does not logically follow from the fact that he was not wearing a jacket.
In my view, the most sensible option for the above statement is option C.
I hope this helps!