Jose, while this is a broad question, I did my best to answer below:
The Articles of Confederation had several limitations, but there were also aspects that were not weaknesses. Here are some points that could be considered strengths or at least not weaknesses:
- Sovereign States: The Articles preserved the independence and sovereignty of states, which was a priority for many Americans at the time.
- Alliance Formation: The Articles allowed for a confederation, essentially an alliance among the states, providing a mechanism for coordinated action.
- Land Ordinance of 1785 and Northwest Ordinance of 1787: These laws provided for organized territorial expansion and statehood, setting a precedent for how the U.S. would expand westward.
- Peace Treaty with Great Britain: The Articles provided the framework for a centralized diplomacy, leading to the Treaty of Paris in 1783 that ended the Revolutionary War.
- War Powers: While limited, the Articles did give the Confederation Congress the power to declare war and make peace, sign treaties, and conduct foreign affairs.
- No Monarchy: The Articles deliberately did not create a monarchy or centralized power that could potentially become tyrannical, addressing a chief concern arising from colonial experiences with British rule.
- Initial Cohesion: It provided an initial structure that united the Thirteen Colonies and helped them coordinate their resistance against Great Britain during the Revolutionary War.
- Amendability: Although not easy, the Articles could be amended with the consent of the states, allowing for potential improvements over time.
If you found this helpful, I would greatly appreciate a positive review. I am new on this platform and it is very helpful.
Thank you!
Benjamin M.
