
Phoebe T. answered 10/17/23
High School & College Tutor: Study Skills & Social Sciences
Hi there! I have a bachelors in psych, this is super important information to understand if you are moving forward with a psych career or degree, if not, it is still pretty straightforward.
two issues that might need to be addressed:
1) Make sure you're clear on run time and time stamps for groups starting their app usage (if the study is 12 weeks, half way is 6 weeks not 8 (I'm assuming this was a typo))
2) The three surveys would need to be administered all three times, you would have no relevant data if you collect each one a single time. Again I assume that was a typo or mis-specification, but this is very important in terms of viability.
- Variables
- (Primary Dependent Variable)
- Stress level
- measured by stress Survey
- (Secondary Dependent Variables)
- mindfulness
- self compassion
- (Primary Independent Variable)
- Usage of Meditation app
- 12 weeks (Treatment 1)
- 6 weeks (Treatment 2)
- none (control)
For analysis, there are multiple ways to determine which you need to use, but the decision really comes down to what you are looking for in the data set.
I believe a one-way anova would be appropriate here, but you could also do a multi-linear regression, depending on how you want to use the non-stress surveys in the study. if you want to use all three survey scores to determine something greater than just stress, then one-way anova still works fine.

Phoebe T.
I forgot about the type of study, technically some of those terms overlap, so again, depending on sample collection, assignment, and selection, the type of study would differ. Any which way you go, it's a correlational study, (both quasi and true experimental are types of correlational studies). Quasi- experimental is probably more accurate because you are only prescribing treatment time, you did not create the actual app/you are not testing the apps effectiveness overall, just the apps effectiveness in reducing stress of a specific population. However there is a stipulation about random assignment, if you use random assignment it again toes the line towards true experimental. I still think it falls under quasi-experimental correlational effects study. Hope this helps & let me know if I can clarify anything else for you!10/17/23