I am assuming that this is a calculus question, not precalculus question.
As a preliminary, for any r > 0 define the function
f(x) = rx/x
This can be rewritten as
f(x) = exln(r)/x
Take the derivative
f'(x) = (xln(r)exln(r) - exln(r))/x² = (xln(r) - 1)exln(r))/x² = (xln(r) - 1)rx/x²
a.
For r < 0 the sequence is not monotonic because
even elements are positive, and odd elements are negative.
b.
The values of the sequence are given to us by {f(n)}.
If the function f(x) is increasing for x ≥ 1 then so is the sequence.
The function is increasing on the interval [1, ∞) if f'(x) > 0 on the interval (1, ∞).
Consider the above calculated derivative f'(x).
The factor rx/x² > 0, so it is only the factor (xln(r) - 1) that determines the sign of f'(x).
For r ≥ e, ln(r) ≥ 1.
So for x > 1, xln(r) > 1.
That makes the f'(x) > 0, which proves that the sequence is increasing.
c.
Use the same reasoning as in b.
For 0 < r ≤ 1, ln(r) ≤ 0.
So for x > 1, xln(r) ≤ 0.
Therefore xln(r) - 1 < 0, therefore f'(x) < 0, therefore the function is decreasing,
therefore the sequence is decreasing.
Note: This raises the interesting question of what happens when 1 < r < e.
Then 0 < ln(r) < 1.
For small values of x, xln(r) < 1, but for large x, xln(r) > 1.
So the sequence starts decreasing and then increasing.
d.
We need to see which values of r give us existence of lim(rn/n) as n -> ∞.
The answer is -1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The reason is than in this interval |rn| ≤ 1, while the denominator increases to ∞.
In contrast, for r > 1 the numerator rn increases faster than the denominator.
(You can convince yourself by applying the L'hopital rule to the function f.)
That makes the limit is infinity.
For r < -1 the sequence in magnitude has the same values as for -r,
but it alternates between positive and negative values.
Therefore the limit is not even +∞ or -∞.
e.
As shown in d. the sequence diverges for r < -1 and r > 1.