Raymond B. answered 05/06/20
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
2cos^2(x) - cos(2x)/tan^2(x)
= 2cos^2(x) - [cos^2(x) - sin^2(x)]/sin^2(x)/cos^2(x)
=2cos^2(x) - [cos^4(x) -sin^2(x)cos^2(x)]/sin^2(x)
=[2sin^2(x)cos^2(x) - cos^4(x) + sin^2(x)cos^2(x)]/sin^2(x)
=[3sin^2(x)cos^2(x) - cos^4(x)]/sin^2(x)
=3cos^2(x) - cos^4(x)/sin^2(x)
= 3cos^2(x) - cos^2(x)cos^2(x)/sin^2(x)
= 3cos^2(x) -cos^2(x)cot^2(x)
=[3-cot^2(x)]cos^2(x)
which is about as simple as it gets. It eliminates the fraction, and is in two factors with just an x angle, without the 2x.
although not that much simpler than the original 2cos^2(x) - cos(2x)/tan^2(x)
To check that this is equivalent, plug in a value for x, such as 60 degrees and see if they give the same values
cos60 = 1/2
cos120 = -1/2
cot60 = 1/sqr3
tan60 = sqr3
2cos^2(60) - cos120/tan^2(60) = 2(1/2)^2 - (-1/2)/sqr3^2 = 1/2 +(1/2)/3 = 1/2+1/6 = 2/3
(3-cot^2(x))(cos^2(x)) = (3-1/3)(1/4) = 8/3(1/4) = 2/3
It works. Odds are that's not a coincidence that they match
But the original expression, 2cos^2(x) - cos(2x)/tan^2(x) probably accidentally copied incorrectly without parentheses for the numerator. Had parentheses been put in then 2cos^2(x)-cos(2x) would be the numerator for [2cos^2(x)-cos(2x)]/tan^2(x) which = [1+cos(2x)-cos(2x)]/tan^2(x) = 1/tan^2(x) = cot^2(x)
Jim G.
there are no parentheses in the problem05/06/20