There does not appear to be adequate information to analyze this problem.
Consider a typical Spearman problem where a Personnel Manager interviews 10 job applicants for one position and ranks their abilities to hold the job. He then has the Assistant Personnel Manager interview
and rank the applicants as well.
Applicants-----------------------------Jerry---Mike---Kim---Tammy---Jake---Steve---Angela---Frank---Emily---Jo
Manager's Ranking-------------------10------9--------1--------5---------4----------2----------8----------3---------6------7
Assistant Manager's Ranking-------7-------3--------2--------8---------4--------10----------5----------1---------9------6
Difference Between Rankings------3-------6------(-1)-----(-3)--------0--------(-8)---------3----------2-------(-3)-----1
Square Of Difference-----------------9------36--------1--------9---------0--------64----------9----------4---------9------1
The Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient is given by rs = 1 − 6∑d2/(n3−n) or "one minus the ratio of (six times the sum of the squares of the differences) to (the sample size cubed minus the sample size). Here rs comes to 1 − 6(142)/990 or 0.139139139... equivalent to 0.1394.
Now state the null and alternative hypotheses:
H0: There is little or no correlation (similarity) between the rankings.
H1: There is significant correlation (similarity) between the rankings.
Next enter a Table Of Critical Values For Spearman Rank Correlation with the arguments α=0.05 (5% significance level) and n=10 (sample size). The table will return a critical value of rc=0.648.
In this case |0.1394|<0.648 so one fails to reject H0. That is to say, there is little or no correlation (similarity) between the rankings.