There is some ambiguity in the statement of the problem. I’m going to assume that guessing "14 in a row" should be interpreted as correctly guessing the suits of the first 14 cards drawn, since I think that is what was meant.
There is also ambiguity in the statement "Take into account that you learned something from the previously exposed card". While this does imply that the cards are drawn from the deck without replacement, it doesn't say how the guesser should "take this into account". The most obvious interpretation is that if more red cards have been drawn, then we guess black next, while if more blacks have been drawn, then we guess red next. If the same number of reds and blacks has been drawn, then our next guess may be red or black randomly.
Intuitively, this strategy should improve our chances of correctly guessing the suits of the first 14 draws compared to the more naive strategy of simply guessing each suit randomly (not taking the previous draws into account). I'm going to solve the problem using both strategies and compare the results. I'll start with a simpler problem, then extend the solution to the more complicated problem.
First suppose we are only guessing at the suits of the first two draws. Suppose also that we aren't taking the result of the first card draw into account, i.e., we guess randomly for both cards (strategy 2). There are 4 possible guesses we might make {RR,RB,BR,BB}, each equally-likely since we are guessing randomly at both draws. Likewise, there are four possible draws {RR,RB,BR,BB}. The draws are not equally-likely because the first card drawn is not returned to the deck. For instance, the draw RR has probability (26/52)(25/51) while the draw RB has probability (26/52)(26/51).
Let C be the event that we correctly guess the suit of all cards drawn. This is the same as the probability that the pair we guess matches the pair drawn. The law of total probability gives
P(C) = P(RR drawn) * P(C | RR drawn) + P(RB drawn) * P(C | RB drawn) +
P(BR drawn) * P(C | BR drawn) + P(BB drawn) * P(C | BB drawn).
Now, each of the conditional probabilities above is 1/4 because the guesses are made randomly. So
P(C) = P(RR drawn) * (1/4) + P(RB drawn) * (1/4) + P(BR drawn) * (1/4) + P(BB drawn) * (1/4)
= [ P(RR drawn) + P(RB drawn) + P(BR drawn) + P(BB drawn) ] * (1/4)
= [ 1 ] * (1/4)
= 1/4.
Now suppose we guess at the suits of the first 3 draws. The possible guesses and draws are {RRR,RRB,RBR,RBB,BRR,BRB,BBR,BBB}. We have
P(C) = P(RRR drawn) * P(C | RRR drawn) + P(RRB drawn) * P(C | RRB drawn) + ... +
P(BBB drawn) * P(C | BBB drawn)
= [ P(RRR drawn) + P(RRB drawn) + ... + P(BBB drawn) ] * (1/8)
= 1/8.
Similarly, if we guess randomly at the suit of each of the first 14 draws, the probability that we guess all 14 correctly is (1/2)14 which is about 0.0000610. Very poor odds. Perhaps using strategy 1 instead will improve our chances?
Return to the scenario where we only guess at the suits of the first two draws, but suppose we base our guess at the second draw on the result of the first draw. If a red is drawn first, we guess black for the second draw. If a black is drawn first, we guess red for the second draw. As before, we have
P(C) = P(RR drawn) * P(C | RR drawn) + P(RB drawn) * P(C | RB drawn) +
P(BR drawn) * P(C | BR drawn) + P(BB drawn) * P(C | BB drawn),
but now some of the conditional probabilities above are zero. For instance, if an R is drawn first, then our strategy dictates that we must guess B for the second draw. So P(C | RR drawn) = 0. Similarly, P(C | BB drawn) = 0. On the other hand, P(C | RB drawn) and P(C | BR drawn) both simplify to P(first suit is guessed correctly). For instance, if we assume the draw is RB, then by correctly guessing R for the first draw, our strategy will force us to guess B for the second draw, which will also be a correct guess. The probability that the first suit is guessed correctly is clearly 1/2. Thus,
P(C) = P(RR drawn) * 0 + P(RB drawn) * (1/2) + P(BR drawn) * (1/2) + P(BB drawn) * 0
= [ P(RB drawn) + P(BR drawn) ] * (1/2)
= [ (26/52)(26/51) + (26/52)(26/51) ] * (1/2)
= 13/51.
Compared the strategy 1, we have have slightly improved our odds (13/51 versus 13/52).
Now suppose we guess at the suits of the first 3 draws using the strategy 1. Recall that the possible guesses and draws are {RRR,RRB,RBR,RBB,BRR,BRB,BBR,BBB}. The law of total probability gives
P(C) = P(RRR drawn) * P(C | RRR drawn) + P(RRB drawn) * P(C | RRB drawn) + ... +
P(BBB drawn) * P(C | BBB drawn).
Each of P(C | RRR drawn), P(C | RRB drawn), P(C | BBR drawn), and P(C | BBB drawn) is zero, for the same reason that P(C | RR drawn) and P(C | BB drawn) are both zero when considering just two draws.
On the other hand, each of P(C | RBR drawn), P(C | RBB drawn), P(C | BRR drawn), and P(C | BRB drawn) is 1/4. Why? Consider P(C | RBR drawn). We have a 26/52 chance of guessing the first suit correctly. Since we are assuming the first suit is R, our second guess will correctly be B. On the third guess, having already drawn one R and one B, the remaining cards are in equal proportions again. So we guess randomly at the third draw, having a 25/50 chance of being correct. So P(C | RBR drawn) = (26/52) * (1) * (25/50) = 1/4.
Thus, after removing all the zero probabilities, we are left with
P(C) = P(RBR drawn) * P(C | RBR drawn) + P(RBB drawn) * P(C | RBB drawn) +
P(BRR drawn) * P(C | BRR drawn) + P(BRB drawn) * P(C | BRB drawn)
= P(RBR drawn) * (1/4) + P(RBB drawn) * (1/4) + P(BRR drawn) * (1/4) + P(BRB drawn) * (1/4)
= [ P(RBR drawn) + P(RBB drawn) + P(BRR drawn) + P(BRB drawn) ] * (1/4)
= [ (26/52)(26/51)(25/50) + (26/52)(26/51)(25/50) + (26/52)(26/51)(25/50) + (26/52)(26/51)(25/50) ] * (1/4)
= 4 * [ (26/51)(1/2)^2 ] * (1/4)
= 13/102.
Let's increase the number of draws to 4. This gives 16 possible sequences of guesses and draws:
{RRRR,RRRB,RRBR,RRBB,RBRR,RBRB,RBBR,RBBB,BRRR,BRRB,BRBR,BRBB,BBRR,BBRB,BBBR,BBBB}
With strategy 1, the only way we will guess all four suits correctly is if the draw sequence is one of RBRB,RBBR,BRRB,BRBR. For instance, assume the sequence of draws is RBBR. Since the first draw is R, our strategy will force us to guess B for the second draw. Since the first three draws are RBB, our strategy will force us to guess R for the second draw. So we will guess the entire sequence RBBR correctly if and only if we guess the first and third draw correctly. This has probability 1/4. On the other hand, if the sequence is, say, RBRR, then we will certainly guess wrong on the fourth draw (and possibly sooner), because our strategy forces us to guess B on the fourth draw. Therefore, we have
P(C) = P(RBRB drawn) * P(C | RBRB drawn) + P(RBBR drawn) * P(C | RBBR drawn) +
P(BRRB drawn) * P(C | BRRB drawn) + P(BRBR drawn) * P(C | BRBR drawn)
= P(RBRB drawn) * (1/4) + P(RBBR drawn) * (1/4) + P(BRRB drawn) * (1/4) + P(BRBR drawn) * (1/4)
= [ P(RBRB drawn) + P(RBBR drawn) + P(BRRB drawn) + P(BRBR drawn) ] * (1/4)
= 4 * [ (26/52)(26/51)(25/50)(25/49) ] * (1/4)
= 325/4998.
At this point, we would like to proceed to the case of 14 card draws. There are a total of 214 possible sequences of Rs and Bs, too many to list. The case of 4 card draws revealed a critical piece of information. Of the 214 possible sequences, the sequences that have any chance of being guessed correctly are precisely the sequences that have the form a1a2a3a4a5a6a7 where each ai comes from the set {RB,BR}. There are 27 such sequences. Each of these sequences has the same probability of being drawn:
(26/52)(26/51)(25/50)(25/49)(24/48)(24/47)(23/46)(23/45)(22/44)(22/43)(21/42)(21/41)(20/40)(20/39)
= (26/51)(25/49)(24/47)(23/45)(22/43)(21/41)(20/39) * (1/2)7
And given that one of these sequences is drawn, the probability that we succeed in guessing the entire sequence correctly is (1/2)7. Therefore, the probability of guessing all 14 suits correctly is
P(C) = 27 * [ (26/51)(25/49)(24/47)(23/45)(22/43)(21/41)(20/39) * (1/2)7 ] * (1/2)7
= (26/51)(25/49)(24/47)(23/45)(22/43)(21/41)(20/39) * (1/2)7
= 6325/88744131
which is about 0.0000713. Recall, using the purely random guess strategy, the probability of guessing all 14 suits correctly is about 0.0000610. So strategy 1 does indeed improve the odds, ever so slightly. But your chances are highly unlikely with either guessing strategy.