Clear way of saying that one set of rules overrides another, if contradicts?

Question

I'm working on updating a constitution, but as it is for a non-incorporated entity it doesn't have to be legally perfect. I'm much more interested in clarity. Here is what I have at the moment: > If any of the regulations of the Guild, the rules of Societies > Council, or other provisions enrolled upon the Guild Statutes Book > should disagree with this any portion of this Constitution or with any > Regulations, then those rules shall be overruled. *Regulation* is defined earlier in the document as >a rule or law that is passed by committee, with on going consequences to the club. Basically: > If A,B, or C contradicts X or Y, then uses A, B or C instead

Answer 1

The verb "supersedes" means that one overrides another. You might also say: "In the event of a conflict between X and Y, the provisions of X govern" or "the provisions of X take precedence over the provisions of Y." When there are multiple governing contractual or policy documents or statutory/regulatory schemes with potentially overlapping effect, it is important to understand how provisions might be interpreted in practical situations. For instance, if you are drafting a compliance policy for a corporation, it is important that you don't inadvertently negate the detailed code of conduct in saying that the law takes precedence over the corporate policy. Law firms with robust compliance practices can usually help you assess these risks and draft appropriately tailored documents.

Answer 2

If any of the regulations of the Guild, the rules of Societies Council, or any other provisions enrolled upon the Guild Statutes Book contradict and/or conflict with any other portion of this Constitution or any Regulation, then those that conflict shall be void. *Regulation* is defined as stated earlier in the document as a rule or law that is passed by committee and with on-going consequences to the club.