
BZ C. answered 04/04/19
Eccentric and Lovable Historian of Politics and Ideas
You hit on a very important point that classical texts by themselves were not enough to have a Scientific Revolution. If it were, the Islamic world should have had its own Scientific Revolution centuries earlier. A key issue to look at is the European development of intellectual networks outside of any singular control. Some things to keep in mind here. Europe was politically divided so it was harder to kill ideas that were unpopular with ruling elites. Add to this, the Church's history of political independence. The Reformation only added to this tendency. You have print that allows our intellectual network to communicate. Consider the example of Galileo. It is remarkable of little, the Catholic Church's persecution of Galileo really mattered for the general course of European science as Pope Urban VIII was limited in his reach by both political and religious boundaries. Remember, science is not a lone genius in a lab. You only get science when your "frenemies" replicate your work and are forced to admit that you are right.
Jim M.
You speak the truth concerning Islamic influence, but forget to add that it was deliberate arson by the Moslems that burned down the library in Alexandria and also that Charlemagne kept quite a library at Acher, which survived the Dark Ages.04/10/19