Let's think of the CORRECT positive diagnoses P(+ | POS) and the CORRECT absence diagnoses as P(+ | NEG). Also, we'll neglect 0.6% of sample size information and, instead, assume a 100% accurate determination of who actually has HIV, and who doesn't, as the basis in this testing scenario [P(POS) = 1 for an accurate base rate] and we'll let (+) denote a true, or accurate, test result.
We now consider Bayes' Theorem to determine the probability of a person listed as testing positive is indeed CORRECTLY testing positive:
P(person | +) = P(+ | POS) * P(POS) / [ P(+ | POS) * P(POS) + P(+ | NEG) * P(NEG) ]
P(person | +) = 0.95 / [ (0.95 + ((1 - 0.92) * (1 - 0.006) ]
= 0.95 / ( 0.95 + 0.07952 ) = 0.95 / 1.02952
= 0.92276 or ~ 92.3 %
Therefore, the likelihood that a positive test result would be incorrect (i.e. should be negative) is 100 % - 92.3 % = roughly 7.7 %
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability
* Also, consider the article on Bayes' Theorem in the 'Drug testing' section:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes%27_theorem#Drug_testing