David W. answered 06/23/15
Tutor
4.7
(90)
Experienced Prof
Hi Norma,
Neither !!
First, PLZ distinguish between rounding a calculation up/down and rounding to a whole object.
For example, this problem states that " 51% of shoes..." -- that is the answer, not the starting value. First, the total number of shoes and the number of high-heals were counted, then the ratio was created and a percent was calculated, THEN the resulting answer was rounded (note: the shoes were not rounded). So, working backwards, the problem is really saying that the true percentage of high-healed shoes is such that rounding that value produces 51%.
Working forward, there are 73 shoes, if 36 of them are high-heals, that is 49% (49.3 rounded down). If 37 of then are high-healed, that is 51% (50,68 rounded up). If 38 are high-heals, that is 52%. So, conclusively, the answer is 37 (note: I did not round shoes either up or down! and rounding shoes might have produced the wrong answer!!!).
Thinking this way is well within the capability of year 6 student if it is explained in a verbose way with lots of examples.
Best wishes.
(p.s., I've worked with graduate-level people who "never thought of that."
Neither !!
First, PLZ distinguish between rounding a calculation up/down and rounding to a whole object.
For example, this problem states that " 51% of shoes..." -- that is the answer, not the starting value. First, the total number of shoes and the number of high-heals were counted, then the ratio was created and a percent was calculated, THEN the resulting answer was rounded (note: the shoes were not rounded). So, working backwards, the problem is really saying that the true percentage of high-healed shoes is such that rounding that value produces 51%.
Working forward, there are 73 shoes, if 36 of them are high-heals, that is 49% (49.3 rounded down). If 37 of then are high-healed, that is 51% (50,68 rounded up). If 38 are high-heals, that is 52%. So, conclusively, the answer is 37 (note: I did not round shoes either up or down! and rounding shoes might have produced the wrong answer!!!).
Thinking this way is well within the capability of year 6 student if it is explained in a verbose way with lots of examples.
Best wishes.
(p.s., I've worked with graduate-level people who "never thought of that."