Raymond B. answered 05/20/24
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
p(w) =.61
p(5) =.49
p(L¬5)=.3
p(L&5) =.09= 9%
P(L)=.39
P(not5) =.51
4 mutually exclusive disjoint outcumes
w&5, L¬5, L&5, w¬5
assuning no ties
p(w&5)+p(L¬5)+p(L&5)+p(w¬5)=1
draw a venn diagram
.21 +.30+.09+.4=1
p(w¬5)=.4
but if ties, then you can get tied up in knots figuring this out
but you know 2 things
P(w) = .61
P(L¬5)=.30
Maybe they tie .09 and never Lose with 5 or more runs
if by chance you interpret the problem as a conditional probability problem
then again use the Venn diagram and get P(L/5) = .3/.51 =about .58824 = 58.824%
assuming no ties
but if ties then ...
You can solve the problem with Bayes Theorem, but it's easier to see visually what's going on with Venn diagrams.It's easier to make a mistake with Bayes. either way you get the same answer, about 1/10 or 3/5 depending on what you want, the intersection or conditional


Patrick F.
05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24

Patrick F.
05/21/24

Patrick F.
05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24

Patrick F.
05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24
James S.
06/11/24
Patrick F.
05/20/24