Raymond B. answered 05/20/24
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
p(w) =.61
p(5) =.49
p(L¬5)=.3
p(L&5) =.09= 9%
P(L)=.39
P(not5) =.51
4 mutually exclusive disjoint outcumes
w&5, L¬5, L&5, w¬5
assuning no ties
p(w&5)+p(L¬5)+p(L&5)+p(w¬5)=1
draw a venn diagram
.21 +.30+.09+.4=1
p(w¬5)=.4
but if ties, then you can get tied up in knots figuring this out
but you know 2 things
P(w) = .61
P(L¬5)=.30
Maybe they tie .09 and never Lose with 5 or more runs
if by chance you interpret the problem as a conditional probability problem
then again use the Venn diagram and get P(L/5) = .3/.51 =about .58824 = 58.824%
assuming no ties
but if ties then ...
You can solve the problem with Bayes Theorem, but it's easier to see visually what's going on with Venn diagrams.It's easier to make a mistake with Bayes. either way you get the same answer, about 1/10 or 3/5 depending on what you want, the intersection or conditional
Patrick F.
There are no ties in baseball :)05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24
James S.
05/20/24
Patrick F.
"Severe weather can force a game to end in a tie." That is not true. Game will resume when the weather clears, could be another day.05/21/24
Patrick F.
So then what is the probability that they win when they score more than 5 runs? .91? When they score more than 5 runs they either win or lose, right? Please just have a look at your logic. We should try to give this student a clear answer.05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24
Patrick F.
OK, so when the Yankees score 5 or more runs, what is the probability that they win?05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24
James S.
05/21/24
James S.
06/11/24
Patrick F.
The question is not asking for the intersection of losing and scoring more than 5 runs. It is asking for the probability of loss given that they score more than 5 runs. It is a conditional probability and Bayes Thm should be used.05/20/24