The total yield per acre as a function of trees planted per acre = the number of tree planted per acre times the number of bushels produced per acre.
y(t) = (90 + t)*(25 - 2t)
y(t) = 90*25 + 25t - 180t - 2*t*t
y(t) = 2,250 - 155t - 2t2
This is a quadratic function. The Precalculus non-derivative solution is t = -b/(2a). In this case, that is:
-(-155) / (-2*2) = -38.75
Since the coefficient of t2 is negative, this indicates the function reaches a maximum at a negative x-value, and decreases from there.
If negative x-values are not allowed, we should pick 0 trees more, and plant 90 trees per acre. If we can decrease the number of trees planted, and the yield equation is still valid, then we should plant either 90 - 39 = 51 trees per acre or 90 - 38 = 52 trees per acre.
Note that we can't plant fractional trees; there must be a whole number of trees. So let us see what the two closest integers to -38.75 yield.
y(39) = (90-39)*(25-2(-39)) = 51*(25+2*39)
= 51* 103 = 5,253 bushels per acre.
y(38) = (90-38)*(25-2(-38)) = 52*(25+76)
= 52*101 = 5,252 bushels per acre.
In this case, plant 51 trees per acre to maximize the entire yield.
Compare this with 90 trees per acre: 90 * 25 = 2,250 bushels per acre. So, we get a much better yield with fewer trees planted. And undoubtedly, a lower cost with fewer trees planted per acre!
Now for the calculus solution: take the derivative and find its zero(s).
y'(x) = -155 - 4t = 0
4t = -155
t = -38.75, exactly the same as before.
Sam A.
Thank you so much for the insights! I had been struggling with this problem for a few days and greatly appreciate it :)11/10/23