
Cameron G. answered 07/23/23
Individualized Science, Math, and Test Prep Tutoring
Hi Mako, I have two ways to explain this, a very grammatical one and a more informal one. I'll post both in the hopes that at least one of them makes sense!
Grammatical answer: There are two direct objects in this sentence, meaning there are two subjects that are being affected by the main verb of "doing harm". You indicate what is affected by the verb using the word "to". Since "people who are not smoking" is also a direct object, it also needs to be preceded by the word "to". I hope this helps!
Informal answer: The reasoning for this is that there is an implied phrase going on in that second part. What I mean by this is that a long (and redundant) form of this sentence is: "First, it does harm not only to people who are smoking, but it also does harm to people who are not smoking." The italicized portion isn't needed because it is implied from earlier in the sentence. But, because it could be there, it only makes sense if the word "to" is included.

Cameron G.
Glad I could help!07/24/23

Patrick S.
Carmen's answer is spot-on, and I will only add that you want to avoid putting the word "not" in between the word "to" and its object or infinitive verb--say, "...not only to people..." rather than "...to not only people..." and "...not to run..." instead of "...to not run...." The second example is called a split infinitive.07/25/23
Mako O.
Hi Cameron, Thank you so much for giving me a great answer. I was able to understand why I thought this sentence was weird. I really appreciate your help.07/24/23