I need to argue that this statement is true...

Question

Extraction of resources - and the ideologies and histories that support extraction - is foundational to unsustainable development. A post-extractive economy, one that still utilizes resources (e.g., water, forests, etc.), but one that centers on alternative economic ideas is necessary for truly sustainable development. 

Answer 1

If you're trying to argue this to someone on the fence or worried primarily on the economic factor - not ecological - it may be conducive to argue that the long-term financial consequences of nonrenewable energy will be worse than the economic growing pains of a transition period. Renewable energy leads to a more stable economy on account of the fact that its, well, renewable.

As an aside, I'd advise being careful with how you phrase your topic. While I agree that what you say is true, the point is you're making a persuasive argument instead of stating apparent fact.