Eugene E. answered 03/05/23
Math/Physics Tutor for High School and University Students
If s is in S, then s ≤ sup S; as k > 0, then ks ≤ k • sup S. Thus k • sup S is an upper bound for k • S, which implies a).
Given e > 0, sup S - e/k is not an upper bound for S. So there is some s in S such that s > sup S - e. We obtain sup(k • S) ≥ ks > k • sup S - e. Since e was arbitrary, b) follows.