Raymond B. answered 02/21/23
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
Profit = R =140A +240B
Cost= C= =25A +50B=2500
divide by 25
A+2B =100
A +B = 60
B =40 acres
A = 20 acres
max Profit would seem to = 140A +240B = 140(20) + 240(40)
= 2800+9600
=$12,400
but devoting all acres to B would maximize Profits
= 240(60) = $14,400
the Costs are "irrelevant" since Profits already includes them, Profit =Revenue minus Costs
there may be a mistake in the problem, it might have been intended to read
Revenue =$120 per acre for A and $240 per acre for B
if so,
then P=R-C = 140A+240B - 25A -50B
= 115A +190B
= 155(20)+190(40)
= 3100+7600
=$10,700
but still B is more profitable per acre
and devoting all 60 to B has profits
= 190(60) = $11,400
No matter how you view the problem
Profits are seemingly maximized by
devoting all 60 acres to crop B
but there's the budget constraint of $2500
60x50 = costs of $3000, over the $2500 budget
she should devote 40 acres to crop B and 20 to crop A
with profit
= 20(140) + 40(240)
=2800+9600
= $11,400
if profits = $140 and $240 per A acres and B acres
or
if revenue = $140 and $240
then
max profits = 20(115)+40(190)
= 2300 + 7600
=$9,900