Raymond B. answered 02/13/23
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
h(t) =-16t^2 +24t + 22
max height is when the derivative h' = 0
= -32t +24
t = 24/32 = 3/4 of a second = 0.75 sec, not 21 seconds
when h(3/4) = 31 feet max
h(3/4) = -16(3/4)^2 +24(3/4) +22 = -9 +18+22 = 31 feet maximum height
yet we're told
max h= 230 feet in 21 seconds
h=0 when t = 29.9 seconds
but h=0 =-16t^2 +24t +22
8t^2 -12t -11 = 0
t =12/16 +/-(1/16)sqr(144+352)
t = 3/4 ++/-sqr496/16
t = about 2.142 and -.642 seconds to hit the ground (ignore the negative square root, as it gives a negative t = -0.64)
NOT 29.9 seconds
there are some mistakes or problems in the problem, possibly miscopied or misprinted
the information is contradictory, to the max
rewrite the quadratic in vertex form
-16t^2 +24t +22
rewrite the quadratic in factor form= about -16(x+.642)(x-2.142)
when x=0 quadratic = 22, not 29.9. 22 is the y intercept, (0, 22), not an x intercept
although -16(x+.65)(x-2.875) with x=0 has 29.9
x coordinate of the x intercept would then be x= 29.9 seconds, a surprising coincidence, although that's a little messy rounding errors
use a graphing calculator, either online or handheld. desmos graphing calculator shows the x zero = 2.142. that's 2.142 seconds to reach ground level, not 29.9 seconds
it's a downward opening parabola with vertex = maximum point = (.75, 31) which means max height of 31 feet reached in 3/4 of a second