
Maurizio T. answered 12/21/22
Business from the point of view of an experienced financial analyst.
Note that if one sets the price at $9/disc, the amount sold can be found by solving
9 = -0.01x2-0.1x+39
This has two solutions: x = -60 which we must discard as it is a negative quantity and x=50 which is the solution we require.
The consumer surplus stems from the fact that while consumers are willing to pay $9 for acquiring 50 units, they would have paid more to acquire the first unit, more to acquire the second unit, ... , more to acquire the 49th unit. Instead they got to purchase each of these units for $9. For instance, how much would consumer pay for just one unit?
p(1)= -0.01*1^2-0.1*1+39 =38.89
For 2, 3, ... ,49 units:
p(2) = -0.01*3^2-0.1*2+39 =38.76
p(3) = -0.01*3^2-0.1*3+39 =38.61
..............
p(49) = -0.01*49^2-0.1*49+39 =10.09
Now, you can find the surplus by taking the difference between each of these numbers and 9 and summing up these numbers. Technically, this is the right way to do it because we cannot really have fractional units. Doing it by hand is a chore, but if you use any software you could find
Consumers' surplus = (38.89-9)+(38.76-9)+(38.61-9) + .... + (10.09-9) = 943.25.
The other way is to use Calculus, although this assumes that we can buy any amount, even fractional amounts.
∫050 ( -0.01x2-0.1x+39 -9) dx ≈958.33
This integral is a bit higher than the sum above for we are considering the problem via continuous quantities. Personally, I believe the first (discrete) solution is the correct one. The second one is an approximation. Needless to say, all these numbers are in $ units.
I hope this helps.