If it tends to be less expensive to live near the bus station, we may view the distance variable as a proxy to the income (when income variable is omitted). As such: smaller distance could mean lower income and using bus more frequently. This perhaps means a weak and negative correlation between distance variable and average number of tickets purchased. In other words, β1 is probably a small values and has a negative sign.
Abigail L.
asked 10/22/22Econometrics Question, see description (was too long)
Determine the sign of the expected bias introduced by omitting a relevant variable. State your assumptions and provide a very brief rationale for your assumptions.
We plan to estimate the following regression:
𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑠𝑖 = 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖 + 𝛽2𝑥1𝑖 + 𝛽3𝑥2𝑖 + ⋯ + 𝛽𝑘+1𝑥𝑘𝑖 + 𝜀𝑖
Where 𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑠𝑖 is the average number of bus tickets person 𝑖 purchases per month, 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖 is the distance of person 𝑖’s residence from the nearest bus station, and the 𝑥 variables are other variables that you think should be held fixed when estimating the effect of 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑖 on 𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑒𝑡𝑠𝑖. We do not observe a person’s income so it cannot be included as a regressor. If it tends to be less expensive to live near bus stations, how do you expect the omission of income from the regression to bias the estimate of 𝛽1?
1 Expert Answer
Still looking for help? Get the right answer, fast.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
OR
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.
Abigail L.
thanks!10/23/22