I edited my original response. Peter R. correctly noted an error in my slope calculation. I divided -2000 by 48, not the 28 that was calculated for the run. I've revised the slope number and corrected results. Thanks, Peter R.
My A answer: I believe this starts as y=mx=b. So, 8000 = -1000(x) + b (this seems like I am way off)
I'm not sure how you arrived at 8000 = -1000(x) + b
Yes, look for an equation of the form
y = mx + b
m, the slope, can be determined by the Rise/Run of a straight line. Pick any two points. I'll choose (20, 8000) and (48, 6000).
Rise (6000-8000) = -2000
Run = (48 - 20) = 28
Slope = Rise/Run = -2000/28 or -71.429
This leads us to y = -71.429x + b
To find b, use one of the points in this equation and solve for b:
y = -71.429x + b for (20,8000)
8000 = -71.492*(20) + b
8000 = -1428.57+ b
b = 9428.57
The linear equation is y = --71.429x +9428.57
B) explain the meaning of the rate of change found in the context of the situation.
[My B answer: Would this be that as wolves increase by 4, rabbits decrease by 1000?] No
This rate of change tells us that the poplution of rabbits decreases by -71.429 for each additional wolf. 4 additional wolves would reduce the rabbitt count by 4*(-71.429) or -286.71 , rounded to -287 since -0.71 of a rabbitt will get to -1 very quickly.
C) interpret the meaning of the constant term in your equation.
[My C answer: I don't have the equation down but the constant is based off the beginning population?} Yes, the constant, 8833.33 is the starting rabbitt population before any wolves were present (x=0). By definition, the y-intercept (b) is the value of y when x=0 (no wolves). The line shows imaginary points when x<0, since it is difficult to have fewer than no wolves in this universe.
Holly I.
Thank you. This I understand.07/23/22