h(t) = -16t^2 + 100
when the cat hits the ground, it's at time t
h(t) = 0 = -16t^2 +100 (h=0 means ground level, while ho=100 is the initial height)
16t^2 = 100
t^2 = 100/16
t = sqr(100/16)
= 10/4
= 2.5
take the derivative of h(t) to calculate velocity at time t
velocity = v(t) = h'(t) = -32t
velocity when the cat hits the ground
= v(2.5) = -32(2.5) = -80 meters per second
it's negative velocity to indicate the speed is downward
There's a Nobel Laureate in physics, Frank Wilczek, also 2022 Templeton Prize winner, who explains why the cat usually lands on its feet, but that still might not save its life or health, from 100 meters. The Nobel guy is into dark energy & matter, and new smaller subatomic particles. "Dark" might include black cats, things harder to see in the dark. "Black Cat Day" is a couple days before Halloween.
80 feet per second is the equivalent of 80/5,280 miles per 1/3,600 hour. 80 meters per seconds is over 3 times as fast. This problem sounds like serious animal abuse. Maybe a felony. PETA would not be amused. Velocity of 80 feet per second
= (80/5280)/(1/3600) = about 56 mph. 5280 feet per mile. 3600 seconds per hour. 3 times as fast is over 168 mph. A mosquito might stand a better chance on your windshield. Or more humane way to go.
While your idea of 100/2.5 = 40 is not correct, it's very interestingly exactly half the correct answer of 80 feet per second.
the higher the initial height, the higher the velocity when it hits the ground. So you're very much on the right track.
Let's say the initial height had been 10,000 meters
then
h(t) = -16t^2 +10,000
and
h(t) = 0 = -16t^2 +10000
t^2 = 10,000/16
t = 100/4 = 25 seconds
v(t) = -32t
v(25) = -32(25) = -800 m/sec
divide 10,000 by 25 = 400,
again exactly one half the actual speed
"velocity" usually has direction as well as magnitude, so it can be negative or positive
while "speed" usually is just the absolute value of velocity, always positive
Nonetheless, cat owners will not like this problem.
The -4.8t^2 and -9.6t terms are close approximations for the effect of gravity at sea level. It's not exact. Also get high enough up and the gravity force is reduced, but air resistance is also reduced given less air at higher altitudes, so it's almost a wash. For a while. If you want to quickly lose weight, just move to the mountains or Colorado and the scales will show you've lost a few pounds, due to less gravity. Go to space and you're weightless. But everyone generally ignores all these complications, for a problem like yours
If you did the 100/2.5 method, you get 40, so multiply it by -2 to get -80 m/sec. I'm curious what your instructor might say, if you did that. 2ho/t. The units match too, as feet divided by seconds = m/sec. which is a measure of velocity.
while some of these PETA or cat owner comments may seem totally irrelevant, actually many or most of these type problems are intended to be realistic or semi-realistic, so if the answers are too far off from what reality would dictate, you might want to recheck the calculations and arithmetic. It happens, that reality may help uncover a miscalculation somewhere.