
Doug C. answered 03/16/22
Math Tutor with Reputation to make difficult concepts understandable
Let's reference dy/dx as equation A and y = -ln(...) as equation B.
Use the fact that (0,-ln5) is a point on the graph of equation B to get one equation involving j and k. This part is fairly straightforward.
-ln(5) = -ln(j-ke2(0)) => 5 = j - k.
Finding another equation involving j and k might work as follows.
Find the derivative from equation B and set it equal to the right side of equation A.
Realize that you can write the right side of equation A as:
2e(2x+ (-ln(j-ke^2x) = 2e2xe(-ln(j-ke^2x)
After setting that equal to the derivative found from equation B, using some properties of logarithms, along with some algebraic simplification....
Give that a try and post a comment if you still need some help.


Luke J.
Very neat approach that does lead to the correct answer but Doug C., why not suggest of solving the differential equation with the initial condition since the equation is separable? And will ultimately lead to where the question is asking and get the values straight without any systems of equations. Just curious about that03/16/22

Doug C.
I actually did solve the problem both ways before posting and admit to having solved by the "system of equations" method first to see where it would lead. Separation of variables led to e^y = 1/(-e^2x +c)=> y = -ln(-e^2x+c) and as you suggested the same result. I did mean to suggest at the end of my posted solution, the alternative, but was hurrying off the to golf course and forgot to do so. For a student learning to solve DE by separation of variables, that solution most likely would have been preferable.03/16/22
Doug C.
verify: desmos.com/calculator/eqpq4xlont03/16/22