Interesting problem. Both Philip and Ashley have answered it correctly. I wanted to illustrate something about this problem by first setting y = (3x-2).
-2(3x-2.4) = -3(3x-2.4)
Substituting y we get:
-2(y) = -3(y)
Whoa, how can -2y = -3y ??
Well, only if y = 0.
y = (3x-2.4)
3x - 2.4 = 0
x = 2.4/3
x = 0.8
Same answer, just a different approach. The proper approach is to complete the calculations as per Ashley and Philip. My contribution is to illustrate a different thought process that also provides an answer.
Bob