Raymond B. answered 08/05/21
Math, microeconomics or criminal justice
-7/8 = -14/16 < -3/16
maybe there were some absolute value signs that were left out, accidentally?
l-7/8l > l-3/16l
7/8 > 3/16
but -7/8 < -3/16 multiply by a negative number and the inequality reverses direction
-(-7/8) > -(-3/16) negative times negative = positive
7/8 > 3/16
the inequality as written is false
as -7/8 is not greater than or equal to -3/16
Or maybe there was also a variable that was left out, as the inequality as written has nothing to solve. Just verify and confirm it as true or show it's false. It's false, as written. It's a contradiction, always false, never true.
You might also plot the two terms -7/8 and -3/16 on a real number line. the number to the left of the other is the smaller number
another way to view it is multiply by 16
-7/8 > or = -3/16
16(-7/8) > or = 16(-3/16)
2(-7) > or = -3
-14 > or = -3
while 14 is greater than 3,
-14 is less than -3
-14 > or + -3 multiply by -1, and reverse the inequality sign
14 < 3 is clearly false.
the inequality as written is always false.
plot -14 and -3 on a real number line
-14 is to the left of -3. the number on the left is the smaller number. -14<-3
Kassidi F.
The way I typed it on the question is how it is shown08/05/21