Nathan S. answered 04/07/20
College Math Lecturer, Game Designer
a subspace W of a vector space V is a subset of V closed under linear combination:
if w and w' are in W and s is a scalar, sw + w' is in W.
w = (x, y, z, 0) and w' = (x', y', z', 0)
sw + w' = s(x,y,z,0) + (x',y',z',0) = (sx + x', sy+y', sz + z', 0).
letting sx + x' = a, sy + y' = b, sz + z' = c, this is (a, b, c, 0), which is in W.
w = (x,y,2x-3y), w' = (x',y',2x'-3y')
sw + w' = s(x,y,2x-3y) + (x',y',2x'-3y') = (sx + x', sy + y', s(2x+3y) + (2x' + 3y'))
.............. = (sx + x', sy + y', 2sx + 3sy + 2x' + 3y') = (sx + x', sy + y', 2(sx + x') + 3(sy + y'))
letting sx + x' = a and sy + y' = b, then this is (a, b, 2a + 3b), which is in W.
w =
[0 a]
[b 0]
w' =
[0 a']
[b' 0]
sw + w' = s[0 a] + [0 a'] = [0 sa + a']
................. [b 0]....[b' 0]....[sb + b' 0]
letting sa + a' = x and sb + b' = y, this is [0 x], which is in W.
....................................................................[y 0]
yes. s(x, 0, y) + (x', 0, y') = (sx + x', 0, sy +y'),
no. (2, 2, 4) is in W but 1/2(2, 2, 4) = (1, 1, 2) is not. So it isn't closed under linear combination
yes. s(x, x-y, y) + (x', x'-y', y') = (sx + x', (sx+x') - (sy+y'), sy + y')