
Doug C. answered 12/19/19
Math Tutor with Reputation to make difficult concepts understandable
Doug C. answered 12/19/19
Math Tutor with Reputation to make difficult concepts understandable
Stanton D. answered 12/19/19
Tutor to Pique Your Sciences Interest
A little awkwardly specified. Are we to rotate the lines for the given equations "around" the x-axis ("around" because (x,y) = (0,0) is already a point of closure of the solid, so x=0 is redundant -- unless I'm missing some essential point?)?
So you could either do this as shells concentric to the x-axis, from y=0 to y=27 -- i.e. within the solid -- OR, take the entire cylindrical region out to x=3, r=27, and subtract shells outside the solid (i.e. in the region y<x^3). it will come to the same result. By the first stratagem:
Each shell has a radius of y, hence a circumference of 2.pi.y , and a length of the value of x at that value of y. Insert these into the summation integral, for y=0 to 27:
int [0,27]( x *2.pi.y dy) = int[0,27]y^(1/3)*2.pi.y dy = int[0,27]2.pi.y^(4/3) dy -- you should be able to take it from there?
-- Cheers, -- Mr. d.
Get a free answer to a quick problem.
Most questions answered within 4 hours.
Choose an expert and meet online. No packages or subscriptions, pay only for the time you need.