
Calin R. answered 11/26/18
Lawyer and Rhetorician, because anything less would be a crime...
They're both considered legal tools of interpretation, however neither one would be enough for any other serious grouping.
One is a set of rules or contractual obligations between a deity and its followers, and the other is a non-religious collection of laws and commentaries.
It's a bit of a stretch to compare them in any other general sense, although rhetorically speaking, they are technically both persuasive documents...but that's also a stretch.