James D. answered 12/13/24
Master of Music from Berklee with 20+ experience writing, composing, a
There is a lot to unpack with this question. It would be helpful to know the purpose of the paper. Why hasn't the instructor taught you how to write it?
As others have expressed, I would also love the opportunity to help you, generally (and specifically with writing any particular paper).
For context: I wrote a 250-page thesis in 2007, only a few years after being invited to join TheFacebook (which had fewer than 20,000 users at that time). We physically spent time in library carrels.
The sudden advancement of "AI" as you're experiencing in your formative years (specifically the LLMs), is indeed alluring. After all, its development and popularization is in part due to a narrative constructed by Wall Street ambition. However, this is still extremely nascent technology. It is quite faulty. For example, Google's "Gemini" — formerly "Bard" — often gets basic facts wrong, and even fails to identify incorrect spelling in written English. These are just some small examples. There are many more layers to this, which together make a reliance on "AI" deeply problematic for a young person's education in the post-2020 world.
This technology is —and will increasingly become — a *great* tool when used responsibly and effectively, as you have correctly pointed out. This is the correct answer when dealing with any technology. It exists as a result of scientific knowledge, and is used to solve human problems, meet our needs, and improve our interactions with our environment.
In short, technology is a tool. Nothing more. It is no substitute for true critical thinking, investigative research, practice, mastery, expression, emotion, etc. Moreover, learning to write with your own style can be extremely rewarding (not only for you, but for your readers).
There is a lot more to say. Perhaps this suffices, for now: many AI papers/articles/etc. are simply boring. They don't connect with people the same way that another human can.
The difference (between "AI" and human voice/tone) will likely become less and less distinguishable as time goes on. However, even as LLMs improve — and as another tutor here has pointed out — if you use AI to write a paper for you, it's not difficult to detect. Our faulty (but already fast, and exponentially improving) AI can often detect other AI writing instantaneously. Of course, the AI also gets it wrong often enough to be statistically significant. The compounding of these errors can set off a chain reaction of flawed logic that can spiral out of control. Think (or write) about that for a second!