J.R. S. answered 01/30/24
Ph.D. University Professor with 10+ years Tutoring Experience
So, this is a problem that deals with the Born Haber cycle.
We begin with the knowledge that
∆Hformation = ∆Hsublimation + Ionization energy + Bond energy + Electron affinity + Lattice energy.
Next, we set up a scheme as follows for MX2
M(s) + X2(g) ==> MX2 ... ∆Hformation = -997
M(s) ==> M(g) ... ∆Hsublimation = 119
M(g) ==>M+(g) ... IE1 = -781 (note: use negative value)
M+(g) ==> M2+(g) ... IE2 = -1386 (note: use negative value)
X2(g) ==> 2X(g) ... Bond energy = 211 (this is for both )
2X(g) ==> 2X-(g) ... Bond energy
M2+(g) + 2X-(g) ==> MX2 ... LE = ? (we are going to solve for Lattice energy)
∆Hformation = ∆Hsublimation + Ionization energy + Bond energy + Electron affinity + Lattice energy
-997 = 119 + (-781) + (-1386) + 211 + LE
-997 = -1837 + LE
LE = 840 kJ/mole
J.R. S.
01/30/24
July J.
lol, i tried both ways and it seems to be wrong. I thought I had more trials to do it my way.01/31/24
July J.
Is it suppose to be -84001/30/24